Table 2 ICP monitoring during EES
From: Preserve encephalus in surgery of trauma: online survey. (P.E.S.T.O)
| Respondents (n = 122) | |
|---|---|
| ICP insertion | |
| Neurosurgeon (attending) | 47 (39%) |
| Neurosurgeon (resident) | 38 (31%) |
| Neurosurgeon (attending + resident) | 32 (26%) |
| Emergency surgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
| Emergency surgeon (attending) + neurosurgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
| Other | 3 (2%) |
| ICP monitoring in patients (%) at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
| 0% | 15 (13%) |
| < 10% | 21 (17%) |
| 10–30% | 35 (29%) |
| 30–50% | 4 (3%) |
| 50–70% | 15 (12%) |
| 70–99% | 23 (19%) |
| 100% | 9 (7%) |
| Protocol for ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
| Yes | 48 (39%) |
| No | 74 (61%) |
| Importance of ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
| Not important | 1 (1%) |
| Somewhat important | 19 (15%) |
| Important | 40 (33%) |
| Very important | 46 (38%) |
| Mandatory | 16 (13%) |