Associated abdominal injuries do not influence quality of care in pelvic fractures—a multicenter cohort study from the German Pelvic Registry

Table 1 Comparison of the demographic data and fracture distribution between patients with an isolated pelvic fracture (group A) and a combined abdominal/pelvic injury (group B)

	Group A	Group B	p value
Number (n)	8.151	3.537
Age (years)	70.5 ± 20.4 [4–105]	47.3 ± 22.0 [12–92]	< 0.001 ^#
Gender			< 0.001 *
Male (n)	35.5% (2.893)	62.1% (2.195)
Female (n)	65.5% (5.258)	37.9% (1.342)
ISS	9 (5)	26 (17)	< 0.001 ^§
Type of pelvic fracture			0.28
Pelvic ring fracture	73.1% (5.956)	74.9% (2.650)
Acetabular fracture	23.3% (1.898)	11.2% (397)
Combined pelvic ring + acetabular fracture	3.6% (297)	13.9% (490)
Type of pelvic ring fracture			< 0.001 *
Stable (Tile A)	44.8% (2.669)	20.0% (530)
Unstable (Tile B/C)	55.2% (3.287)	80.0% (2.120)

ISSN: 1749-7922