You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the clinical course between patients with an isolated pelvic fracture (group A) and patients with a combined abdominal/pelvic injury (group B). Patients in group B were operated significantly more often due to their pelvic fracture. The time until emergency stabilization was shorter in group B, while the time until definitive pelvic surgery was longer. The clinical course was significantly prolonged with increased rates of morbidity and mortality.

From: Associated abdominal injuries do not influence quality of care in pelvic fractures—a multicenter cohort study from the German Pelvic Registry

 Group AGroup Bp value
Number (n)8.1513.537 
Hemodynamical status at admission  < 0.001*
  Hb <8.0g/dl12.2 % (6/49)24.7 % (174/705) 
  RRsyst. <100mmHg17.1% (7/41)32.7 % (224/686) 
Operative pelvic stabilization   
  Emergency stabilization6.7 % (547)34.4 % (1.216)<0.001*
  Definitive pelvic fixation29.9 % (2.440)53.4 % (1.888)<0.001*
  Time until emergency stabilization (min)113 ± 97 [2 – 420]76 ± 76 [2 – 406]<0.001#
  Time until definitive fixation (days)5.4 ± 8.0 [0 – 42]5.2 ± 5.5 [0 – 43]0.19#
Clinical course   
  Length of hospital stay (days)13 ± 14 [0 – 213]27 ± 25 [0 – 287]<0.001#
  Overall morbidity9.9 % (805)21.9 % (776)<0.001*
  Osteosynthesis-associated morbidity7.6 % (186)10.6 % (201)0.001*
  Overall mortality1.9 % (157)8.0 % (287)<0.001*
  1. *Mann-Whitney-U-test (isolated pelvic fracture vs. combined injury)
  2. #Student`s t-test (isolated pelvic fracture vs. combined injury)